Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
SADF v National Disability Insurance Agency [2023] FCA 557 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Suppressed judgment 2 November 2022
File number: SAD 181 of 2022
Judgment of: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 2 June 2023
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for leave to appeal – where primary judge ordered that applicant be removed as litigation representative for daughter – whether decision is attended with sufficient doubt – whether substantial injustice would result if leave were refused – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 9.61 and 9.66(3)
Cases cited: Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design and Developments Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 577 Decor Corporation Pty Ltd & Anor v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 Gambaro v Mobycom Mobile Pty Ltd [2019] FCAFC 144
Division: General Division
Registry: South Australia
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 23
Date of last submissions: 19 April 2023 (Amicus Curiae) 2 May 2023 (Applicant)
Date of hearing: 19 April 2023 Heard on the Papers
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant is self-represented
Amicus Curiae: Simon Ower KC
First to Third Respondents: The First to Third Respondents did not appear
Interested Party: Wearing & Blairs Pty Ltd (Trading As Wearing & Blairs) A Firm did not appear
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate