Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Thompson v Lane (Trustee) (Costs) [2023] FCA 568 File number(s): QUD 86 of 2022
Judgment of: GOODMAN J
Date of judgment: 2 June 2023
Catchwords: COSTS – Full Court ordered that the appellant pay the respondents' costs – second respondent sought order providing priority in the payment of its costs and for its costs to be fixed on a lump-sum basis – application granted
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 32, 109 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 37M, 43 Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2016 (Cth), r 13 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 40 Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (Qld), ss 94 and 100
Cases cited: Kerr (Trustee), in the matter of Cross (Bankrupt) v Bechara (No 2) [2015] FCA 444 Lawman v Queensland Building Services Authority [2000] FCA 174 Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 146; (2017) 253 FCR 403 Thompson v Lane (No 3) [2022] FCA 128 Thompson v Lane (Trustee) (No 4) [2022] FCA 616 Thompson v Lane (Trustee) [2023] FCAFC 32
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 20
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate