Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Quach v Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Adjournment) [2023] FCA 576 File number(s): ACD 29 of 2021
Judgment of: THAWLEY J
Date of judgment: 1 June 2023
Date of publication of reasons: 2 June 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal from summary judgment – request for adjournment – medical certificate – whether evidence sufficient to warrant grant of adjournment – adjournment refused
Cases cited: BXD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 765 Kaur v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 565 Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 108 NAKX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1559 MZZTC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1209
Division: General Division
Registry: Australian Capital Territory
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 13
Date of hearing: 1 June 2023
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms E Latiff
Solicitor for the Respondent: MinterEllison
ORDERS ACD 29 of 2021
BETWEEN: DR MICHAEL VAN THANH QUACH Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN HEALTH PRACTITIONER REGULATION AGENCY Respondent
order made by: THAWLEY J DATE OF ORDER: 1 JUNE 2023
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The adjournment application be dismissed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate