Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Kayler-Thomson v Colonial First State Investments Limited (No 3) [2023] FCA 606 File number: VID 1313 of 2018
Judgment of: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 9 June 2023
Catchwords: PRIVILEGE - application for production of documents for inspection - where respondent resists production on basis of claim to legal professional privilege - where proceedings concern conduct of first respondent as trustee of superannuation funds - where proceedings brought on behalf of members of superannuation funds - whether joint legal professional privilege exists between third applicant and first respondent as beneficiary and trustee - where disputed documents relate to time periods when the third respondent was not invested in the relevant option - where previous interlocutory application brought by the first applicant was dismissed - where first respondent maintains the previous decision is binding upon the third applicant - where first respondent alleges the doctrine of Anshun estoppel precludes new reasons being raised by the third applicant - consideration of structure of the Trust Deed - consideration of beneficiary's interest in the trust - questions for determination adjudicated on basis that joint privilege exists
Legislation: Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (Cth)
Cases cited: D A Christie Pty Ltd v Baker [1996] 2 VR 582 Dyczynski v Gibson [2020] FCAFC 120; (2020) 280 FCR 583 Harvard Nominees Pty Ltd v Tiller (No 4) [2022] FCA 105 Kayler-Thomson v Colonial First State Investments Limited (No 2) [2021] FCA 854 Schreuder v Murray (No 2) [2009] WASCA 145 Shimson v MLC Nominees Pty Ltd [2021] VSCA 363 Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR Zhang v Minister of Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs [1993] FCA 715
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate