Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Zircon Australia Pty Ltd v BCC Trade Credit Pty Ltd trading as Bond and Credit Co [2023] FCA 636 File number: NSD 1374 of 2021
Judgment of: STEWART J
Date of judgment: 9 June 2023
Catchwords: COSTS – where parties with a routine costs order in their favour request reasons for the order – purpose of such request questioned – where applicant filed further amended originating application by consent – where respondents seek orders for costs thrown away – applicable principles and exercise of discretion
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43(2)
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission, in the matter of Whitebox Trading Pty Ltd v Whitebox Trading Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCA 385 Kazar (Liquidator) v Kargarian; In the Matter of Frontier Architects Pty Ltd (In Liq) [2011] FCAFC 136; 197 FCR 113 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; ex parte Lai Qin [1997] HCA 6; 186 CLR 622 Richmond v Ora Gold Ltd [2020] FCA 70 TFM Epping Land Pty Ltd v Decon Australia Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 955
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Number of paragraphs: 21
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate