Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Fair Work Ombudsman v Blue Sky Kids Land Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (No 2) [2023] FCA 644 File number: NSD 1444 of 2019
Judgment of: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 15 June 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where respondents made certain admissions in defence, after which applicant filed amended statement of claim and in amended defence respondents denied matters they had previously admitted without seeking leave to do so – whether leave is required and, if so, whether leave should be granted
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Adeang v The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (No 2) [2016] FCA 1599 Juno Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd v Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc [2019] FCA 526 Yarrabee Chicken Company Pty Ltd v Steggles Ltd [2010] FCA 394
Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 43
Date of last submission/s: 22 May 2023
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M Seck
Solicitor for the Applicant: Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
Counsel for the Third and Fourth Respondents: Mr S McIntosh
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate