Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Mutch v ISG Management Pty Ltd (No 3) [2023] FCA 648 File number: VID 1492 of 2018
Judgment of: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 16 June 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – representative proceedings – approval of discontinuance – whether proposed discontinuance would be unfair, unreasonable or adverse to the interests of group members – discontinuance approved
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 500(2) Fair Entitlements Guarantee Act 2012 (Cth) s 38 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 33J, 33V, 33ZE Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 26.12
Cases cited: Babscay Pty Ltd v Pitcher Partners (2020) 148 ACSR 551 Davaria Pty Limited v 7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1234 Laine v Thiess Pty Ltd [2016] VSC 689 Mutch v ISG Management Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 362 Mutch v ISG Management Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 954 Simonetta v Spotless Group Holdings Ltd [2017] FCA 1071 Tate v Westpac Banking Corporation (No 2) [2020] FCA 1374
Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 27
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Solicitor for the Applicant: Shine Lawyers
Solicitor for the Respondent: Lander & Rogers
ORDERS VID 1492 of 2018
BETWEEN: ROBERT MUTCH Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate