Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Tikomaimaleya v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 659 File number(s): NSD 1263 of 2021
Judgment of: GOODMAN J
Date of judgment: 20 June 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of the decision of the respondent Minister not to revoke, under s 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), the earlier cancellation of the applicant's visa under s 501(3A) of the Act – whether the Minister failed to afford procedural fairness to the applicant by not inviting him to comment on two issues – whether the Minister failed to properly engage with and consider evidence and issues concerning impediments to be faced by the applicant upon removal from Australia – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 501, 501CA
Cases cited: Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd [1994] FCA 1074; (1994) 49 FCR 576 CQI18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCA 1168 Degning v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 67; (2019) 270 FCR 451 ECE21 v Minister for Home Affairs [2023] FCAFC 52 EXT20 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] FCAFC 72; (2022) 291 FCR 55 F Hoffmann-La Roche & Co AG v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [1975] AC 295 Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 225; (2018) 267 FCR 628 KXXH v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 111; (2022) 292 FCR 15 Milne v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCAFC 41; (2011) 120 ALD 405 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188; (2019) 272 FCR 589 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v Viane [2021] HCA 41; (2021) 96 ALJR 13 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17; (2022) 96 ALJR 497 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6; (2003) 214 CLR 1 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63; (2006) 228 CLR 152 Telstra Corporation Ltd v Kendall (1995) 55 FCR 221 Tikomaimaleya v R [2017] NSWCCA 214; (2017) 95 NSWLR 315 Tikomaimaleya v The Queen [2021] HCASL 157
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate