Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Makowski v Legal Profession Admission Board [2023] FCA 666 File number(s): NSD 1348 of 2021
Judgment of: THAWLEY J
Date of judgment: 21 June 2023
Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS – application for leave pursuant to s 46PO of the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) – where complaint of discrimination was terminated by the Australian Human Rights Commission – whether claims of unlawful discrimination are reasonably arguable and not fanciful – leave refused
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) ss 46PO(3A), 46PH(1)(c) Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) ss 4, 5, 6, 10, 22 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW) s 19(1) NSW Admission Board Rules 2015 rr 27J(3), 59(1), 59(3), 59(4), 64
Cases cited: Budini v Sunnyfield [2019] FCA 2164 James v WorkPower Inc [2018] FCA 2083 Jones v Westpac Banking Corporation [2020] FCA 238 Makowski v Legal Profession Admission Board (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 443 Makowski v Legal Profession Admission Board [2020] NSWCA 305 Makowski v Legal Profession Admission Board [2021] HCASL 36 Purvis v State of New South Wales (Department of Education and Training) [2003] HCA 62; 217 CLR 92 Wilson v Britten-Jones (No 2) [2020] FCA 1290
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate