Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Millsom v North Melbourne College Aus Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 677 File number(s): VID 50 of 2022
Judgment of: HESPE J
Date of judgment: 22 June 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – summary dismissal application pursuant to Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A(2) and/or Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 26 – whether applicant has no reasonable prospect of successfully prosecuting the proceeding – res judicata – cause of action or claim estoppel – issue estoppel – Anshun estoppel – whether deed of release rendered subsequent proceedings an abuse of process
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 45, 323, 545, 546(3) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A(2) Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (Cth) Superannuation Guarantee Charge Act 1992 (Cth) Educational Services (Post-Secondary Education) Award 2010 cl 20.2 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 26.01
Cases cited: Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464 Bryant v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No 3) [1995] FCA 1552 Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd [1995] HCA 24; (1995) 185 CLR 410 Chamberlain v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [1988] HCA 21; (1988) 164 CLR 502 Clayton v Bant [2020] HCA 44; (2020) 272 CLR 1 Donnelly v Kempsey Local Aboriginal Land Council [2020] NSWSC 1548 Fernando v Commonwealth [2014] FCAFC 181; (2014) 231 FCR 251 Grant v John Grant & Sons Pty Ltd (1954) 91 CLR 112 Hoysted v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1926] AC 155; (1925) 37 CLR 290 Jackson v Goldsmith (1950) 81 CLR 446 Kinch v Walcott (1929) AC 482 Pollnow v Armstrong [2000] NSWCA 245 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun (1981) 147 CLR 589 Robinson v Deep Investments Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 232 Sheehy v Nuix Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 56 Spencer v Commonwealth [2010] HCA 28; (2010) 241 CLR 118 Timbercorp Finance Pty Ltd (in liq) v Collins [2016] HCA 44; (2016) 259 CLR 212 Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 28; (2015) 256 CLR 507 Trawl Industries of Australia Pty Ltd v Effem Foods Pty Ltd (1992) 36 FCR 406 Trkulja v Google LLC [2018] HCA 25; (2018) 263 CLR 149 Victoria International Container Terminal Ltd v Lunt [2021] HCA 11; (2021) 271 CLR 132 Wardman v Macquarie Bank Ltd [2023] FCAFC 13 Western Australia v Fazeldean (No 2) [2013] FCAFC 58; (2013) 211 FCR 150 Willoughby v Clayton Utz (No 2) [2009] WASCA 29; (2009) 40 WAR 98 Zetta Jet Pte Ltd v The Ship "Dragon Pearl" (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 132; (2018) 265 FCR 290
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate