Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
BLG23 v BLH23, in the matter of BLG23 (No 2) [2023] FCA 737 File number(s): NSD 1121 of 2022
Judgment of: GOODMAN J
Date of judgment: 30 June 2023
Date of publication of reasons: 30 June 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appellant ordered to provide security for costs – security not provided – first respondent sought dismissal of the appeal – appellant resisted order for dismissal on the basis that she proposes to commence a proceeding in the High Court of Australia which will have the effect of setting aside the costs order upon which the bankruptcy notice was founded – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 25, 56 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 40
Cases cited: BLG23 v BLH23, in the matter of BLG23 [2023] FCA 572 Du Bray v ACW [2021] FCAFC 103 Lafferty v Waterton (No 2) [2020] FCA 1673
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 14
Date of hearing: 30 June 2023
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr G McDonald
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Byrnes Legal
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Mr D Vosnakis of Roser Lawyers
ORDERS NSD 1121 of 2022
BETWEEN: BLG23 Appellant
AND: BLH23 First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate