Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Rewha v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 748 Review of: Rewha v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] AATA 19
File number: WAD 30 of 2023
Judgment of: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 19 May 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – where the applicant seeks review of decision by Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) to affirm the Minister's decision not to revoke visa cancellation under s 501(3A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act) – where the applicant is granted leave to amend the originating application for review to include ground for review – where Tribunal discounted an assessment by the Department of Justice that the applicant was at 'low risk of reoffending' – where the alleged error was an absence of any evidentiary foundation in the material before the Tribunal for discounting the assessment – where the Tribunal failed to give notice of the discounting – where it is alleged the applicant was denied procedural fairness by failing to afford an opportunity to be heard in respect of the assessment – Commissioner for ACT Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 applied – where Tribunal contemplates calling in aid the presiding member's own observations in a way which could prejudice the interests of applicant NAEH of 2002 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2022] FCA 927 applied – where the Tribunal acted adversely to the applicant without evidence to support the discounting of assessment – decision affected by jurisdictional error – decision of Tribunal quashed by writ of certiorari – writ of mandamus issued directing Tribunal to decide according to law
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate