Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Rathner (Liquidator), in the matter of PE Capital Nominees Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Runner Investment Limited [2023] FCA 754 File number(s): VID 585 of 2021
Judgment of: MCEVOY J
Date of judgment: 5 July 2023
Catchwords: MORTGAGES AND SECURITIES – where trustee company legally owned land which was the subject of three registered mortgages – company defaulted and went into liquidation – application by liquidators for orders in relation to trust assets – cross claims in relation to the land by mortgagees – where first mortgagee refused to exercise power of sale under s 77 of the Transfer of Land Act 1958 (Vic) – where second mortgagee sought to exercise the power of sale – where first and third mortgagees contended that the second mortgagee could not exercise the power of sale by reason of the terms of a priority deed – whether first mortgagee could enforce the priority deed to prevent the sale of the land by the second mortgagee – whether first mortgagee had the benefit of the priority deed under a trust – validity of notice of default issued under s 76 of the Transfer of Land Act 1958 (Vic) by second mortgagee – whether first and third mortgagee entitled to discretionary relief – whether second mortgagee could validly exercise power of sale by discharging first mortgage debt from proceeds of sale – when first mortgagee's entitlement to interest ends – whether utility in granting relief – where second mortgagee would have been entitled to relief had the first mortgagee not subsequently disposed of the land
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 468; Sch 2, s 90-15 Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984 (Vic) s 38 Transfer of Land Act 1958 (Vic) ss 45(2), 76, 77, 90(3), 116A Trustee Act 1958 (Vic) s 63 Property Law Act 1958 (Vic) ss 18, 50, 56(1), 78, 86, 222 Property Law Act 1969 (WA) s 11(1) Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) r 2.2 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 16.05(2) Conveyancing and Law of Property Act 1881 (UK) s 5 Law of Property Act 1925 (UK), s 56(1), 78(1), 205(ix)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate