Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Zirk-Sadowski v University of New South Wales [2023] FCA 805 File number(s): VID 680 of 2022
Judgment of: ANDERSON J
Date of judgment: 1 June 2023
Date of publication of reasons 17 July 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment – where applicant has filed an originating application and concise statement but not a statement of claim – whether respondents required to file defence in circumstances where applicant has not filed statement of claim – application refused
Legislation: Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Breezway Australia (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Preference Manufacturing Pty Ltd (No 3) [2013] FCA 67 Lawson v New South Wales Minister for Land and Water Conservation [2007] FCA 8 Wu v Avin Operations Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 36 at [51]
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 11
Date of hearing: 1 June 2023
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the University of New South Wales: Mr A Pollock
Solicitor for the Fair Work Commission: Mr S Reeves of Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS VID 680 of 2022
BETWEEN: DR JAN ZIRK-SADOWSKI Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate