Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Renet v Owner – Strata Plan SP22143 (Costs) [2023] FCA 821 Appeal from: The Owner - Strata Plan SP22143 v Renet [2022] FedCFamC2G 953
File number: ACD 58 of 2022
Judgment of: RAPER J
Date of judgment: 20 July 2023
Catchwords: COSTS – appeal dismissed – appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia dismissing an application for review of a Registrar's orders – where Registrar made sequestration order against the estate of the appellant
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 43, 43(3)(d) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 40.02(b), 40.30(b), Sch 3 Items 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, 3.3, 8.1, 19.1
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Colgate-Palmolive Pty Ltd (No 5) [2021] FCA 246; 151 ACSR 26 Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 Hamod v New South Wales [2002] FCA 424; 188 ALR 659 Leary v Leary [1987] 1 WLR 72; [1987] 1 All ER 261 Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 146; 253 FCR 403 Pekar v Holden (No 2) [2021] FCA 343 Re Wilcox; Ex parte Venture Industries Pty Ltd (1996) 72 FCR 151 Renet v The Owner – Strata Plan SP 22143 [2023] FCA 631 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd [2007] FCA 2059 Wills v Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Skills Quality Authority (Costs) [2022] FCAFC 43 Wu v Avin Operations Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] FCA 792
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate