Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CEU22 v Minister for Home Affairs (No 2) [2023] FCA 867 File number: VID 17 of 2022
Judgment of: SNADEN J
Date of judgment: 2 August 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of visa cancellation decision – where decision made on national interest grounds – where applicant subject of adverse security assessment under the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 (Cth) – where applicant failed to meet character test pursuant to s 501(6)(g) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the Minister properly construed Australia's international non-refoulement obligations – whether "generalised risk of harm" sufficient to engage international non-refoulement obligations – whether national interest gives rise to obligation to consider international non-refoulement obligations – whether failure to read and consider relevant materials – whether the Minister impermissibly engaged in a de facto delegation – whether Minister's decision affected by apprehended bias – whether Minister's decision affected by new species of jurisdictional error – application dismissed CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – whether s 64 of the Constitution prohibits concurrent ministerial appointments – whether concurrent appointments offend implicit guarantee of responsible government
Legislation: Constitution s 64 Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 (Cth) s 38 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 78B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 198, 476A, 501 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 8.11 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, opened for signature 16 December 1966, 999 UNTS 171 (entered into force 23 March 1976) arts 6 and 7
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate