Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Copeland (liquidator), in the matter of Bretkel Pty Ltd v Lovelock [2023] FCA 879 File number: NSD 86 of 2023
Judgment of: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 25 May 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment pursuant to r 5.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where defendants have failed to file defences and appear in proceedings – where plaintiff seeks pre- and post-judgment interest – application granted
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 588G(2) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 51A and s 52 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 5.23(2)(c)
Cases cited: Chamberlain Group, Inc v Giant Alarm System Co, Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 1606 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Sibai [2015] FCA 1465
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 11
Date of hearing: 25 May 2023
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Hilton Bradley Lawyers
Counsel for the Defendants: The Defendants did not appear
ORDERS NSD 86 of 2023 IN THE MATTER OF BRETKEL PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 639 072 307
BETWEEN: MR BRENDAN COPELAND IN HIS CAPACITY AS LIQUIDATOR OF BRETKEL PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 639 072 307 Plaintiff
AND: MS KELLIE ANN LOVELOCK First Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate