Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Callan v Chawk [2023] FCA 898 File number(s): NSD 785 of 2021
Judgment of: HALLEY J
Date of judgment: 3 August 2023
Catchwords: DEFAMATION – whether respondent, a former patient of the applicant, published a defamatory review of the applicant on an internet ratings website for medical practitioners – defence of honest opinion under s 31 of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) (Act) – defence of qualified privilege under s 30 of the Act – where respondent did not succeed in defences under s 30 and s 31 of the Act – where Review found to convey three of the four imputations advanced by applicant DAMAGES – assessment of damages – where applicant awarded damages for non-economic loss – where applicant not entitled to aggravated damages
Legislation: Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth) s 9 Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) ss 4, 30, 31, 34, 35 Defamation Amendment Act 2020 (NSW) sch 4
Cases cited: Al Muderis v Duncan (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 726 Ali v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 183 Bauer Media Pty Ltd & Anor v Wilson (No 2) [2018] VSCA 154; 56 VR 674 Bazzi v Dutton (2022) 289 FCR 1; [2022] FCAFC 84 Bickel v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1981] 2 NSWLR 474 Boyd v Automatic, Inc [2019] FCA 86 Bristow v Adams [2012] NSWCA 166 Burgundy v Royale Investments Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1987) 18 FCR 212 Carson v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 44; [1993] HCA 31 Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome [1972] AC 1027 Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd v Manock (2007) 232 CLR 245; [2007] HCA 60 Chau v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 185 Colagrande v Kim [2022] FCA 409 Colagrande v Telstra Corporation Limited [2020] FCA 1595 Cripps v Vakras [2014] VSC 279 Crosby v Kelly (2012) 203 FCR 451; [2012] FCAFC 96 Dow Jones & Company Inc v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575; [2002] HCA 56 Dutton v Bazzi [2021] FCA 1474 Hanson-Young v Leyonhjelm (No 4) [2019] FCA 1981 Harbour Radio Pty Ltd v Tingle [2001] NSWCA 194 Herron v HarperCollins Publishers Australia Pty Ltd (2022) 292 FCR 336; [2022] FCAFC 68 Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] QB 946 John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v O'Shane [2005] NSWCA 164 John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Rivkin [2003] HCA 50 Kabbabe v Google LLC [2020] FCA 126 Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520; [1997] HCA 25 Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd [1964] AC 234 Lorbek v King [2022] VSC 218 Morgan v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (No 2) (1991) 23 NSWLR 374 Nationwide News Pty Limited v Rush [2020] FCAFC 115 Nettle v Cruse [2021] FCA 935 Oliver v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 583 Rana v Google Inc (2017) 254 FCR 1; [2017] FCAFC 156 Ratcliffe v Evans [1892] 2 QB 524 Roberts v Bass (2002) 212 CLR 1; [2002] HCA 57 Rogers v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (2003) 216 CLR 327; [2003] HCA 52 Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 7) [2019] FCA 496 Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 357 Schiff v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCA 1120 Sims v Jooste (No 2) [2016] WASCA 83 State of New South Wales v IG Index plc (2007) 17 VR 87; [2007] VSCA 212 Stead v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 15 Stephens v West Australian Newspapers Limited (1994) 182 CLR 211; [1994] HCA 45 Stocker v Stocker [2020] AC 593 Tavakoli v Imisides (No 4) [2019] NSWSC 717 Thunder Studios Inc (California) v Kazal (No 12) [2022] FCA 110 Triggell v Pheeney (1951) 82 CLR 497; [1951] HCA 23 Waterhouse v Broadcasting Station 2GB Pty Ltd (1985) 1 NSWLR 58 Webster v Brewer (No 3) [2020] FCA 1343
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate