Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Penttila v Woolworths Limited [2023] FCA 912 Appeal from: Penttila v Woolworths Ltd [2022] FedCFamC2G 480
File number(s): QUD 294 of 2022
Judgment of: MEAGHER J
Date of judgment: 7 August 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for an extension of time and leave to appeal the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) – Extension of time granted – Whether any merit in draft grounds of appeal – Application for leave to appeal refused – Application dismissed
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 140, 183 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act (Cth) s 24 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 4.12, 35.13, 35.14, 39.32
Cases cited: Aqua-Marine Marketing Pty Ltd v Pacific Reef Fisheries (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 4) [2011] FCA 578; 194 FCR 479 Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) v Rich [2005] NSWSC 417; 216 ALR 320 Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; 60 CLR 336 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen [1984] FCA 174; 3 FCR 344 Lee v Lee [2019] HCA 28; 266 CLR 129 Penttila v Woolworths Ltd [2022] FedCFamC2G 480 Porter as former trustee of the estates of Ghasemi and Kakhsaz v Ghasemi [2021] FCAFC 144; 286 FCR 556
Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 35
Date of hearing: 25 May 2023
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate