Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Electoral Commissioner of the Australian Electoral Commission v Laming (No 2) [2023] FCA 917 File number: QUD 443 of 2021
Judgment of: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 9 August 2023
Catchwords: PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS (CTH) – Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) – whether respondent contravened s 321D(5) by communicating electoral matter on a Facebook page without disclosure of his name and town or city – whether communications were of electoral matter – whether rebuttable presumption that matter is electoral matter is engaged – whether communications were for dominant purpose of influencing the way electors vote in a federal election – whether news or current affairs exception engaged – whether meeting exception engaged – respondent contravened s 321D(5) PECUNIARY PENALTIES – whether each Facebook post constituted only a single contravention or whether there was a contravention each time a post was read – where respondent deliberately disguised he was the author of one post – where respondent is no longer a member of the House of Representatives – where respondent cooperated by making admissions – where few persons viewed the posts – appropriate penalties determined EVIDENCE – Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – whether expert reports inadmissible – whether reports irrelevant, unfairly prejudicial or result in undue waste of time – reports admitted into evidence EVIDENCE – where further expert reports produced during hearing – prejudice to applicant – reports not admitted into evidence PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to withdraw admissions – where respondent sought to withdraw admission during hearing – leave refused
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate