Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Buzadzic v Commissioner of Taxation [2023] FCA 954 Appeal from: Buzadzic and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation) [2021] AATA 4820
File number: VID 38 of 2022
Judgment of: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 16 August 2023
Catchwords: TAXATION – appeal on question of law from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – assessment under s 167 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – whether the Tribunal applied the wrong test for burden of proof – whether the Tribunal made findings of fact or reached conclusions that were unreasonable – whether the Tribunal misconstrued or misapplied s 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) – whether the Tribunal misconstrued or misapplied the "fraud or evasion" provision – whether the Tribunal failed to afford the applicant procedural fairness
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 44 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 1305 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 164 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), ss 109RB, 167, 170, 262A Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth), s 6-5 Tax Administration Act 1953 (Cth), s 14ZZK, Sch 1, ss 284-75, 284-90, 284-220
Cases cited: Binetter v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2016] FCAFC 163; 249 FCR 534 Bosanac v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2019] HCA 41; 374 ALR 425 Bosanac v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCAFC 116; 267 FCR 169 Brown v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2001] FCA 596; 47 ATR 178 Denver Chemical Manufacturing Co v Commissioner of Taxation (NSW) [1949] HCA 25; 79 CLR 296 Evans v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 19 ATR 1784 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Cassaniti [2018] FCAFC 212; 266 FCR 385 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v McNeil [2007] HCA 5; 229 CLR 656 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Montgomery [1999] HCA 34; 198 CLR 639 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Ross [2021] FCA 766; 174 ALD 77 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Stone [2005] HCA 21; 222 CLR 289 Haritos v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCAFC 92; 233 FCR 315 Henderson v Queensland [2014] HCA 52; 255 CLR 1 Hines v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1952) 5 AITR 305 Imperial Bottleshops Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1991] FCA 352; 22 ATR 148 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; 264 CLR 541 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; 249 CLR 332 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd [1992] HCA 66; 67 ALJR 170 Nguyen v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2018] FCA 1420; 265 FCR 355 Osland v Secretary to the Department of Justice [2010] HCA 24; 241 CLR 320 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17; 400 ALR 417 Price Street Professional Centre Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCA 345; 66 ATR 1 Repatriation Commission v O'Brien [1985] HCA 10; 155 CLR 422 Sharp Corporation of Australia Pty Ltd v Collector of Customs [1995] FCA 707; 59 FCR 6 Waterford v Commonwealth [1987] HCA 25; 163 CLR 54 Weyers v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2006] FCA 818; 63 ATR 268
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate