Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Wilson (No 3) [2023] FCA 1009 File number: WAD 259 of 2018
Judgment of: JACKSON J
Date of judgment: 28 August 2023
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - directors' duties - duty of care and diligence - s 180(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - alleged failure by managing director to tell board of termination of material agreements - consideration of hypothetical reasonable director - finding that managing director knew of possibility of termination - finding that hypothetical reasonable director would not have informed board of impending termination - factual foundation of case that managing director knew of actual termination not made out - no breaches of duty of care and diligence established CORPORATIONS - continuous disclosure obligations - s 180(1) and s 674 of the Corporations Act - exposure of company by managing director to risk of adverse consequences - consideration of breach of director's duty of care and diligence in said exposure - no allegation that company did breach s 674 of the Corporations Act - board lost opportunity to make disclosures about termination of material agreements - hypothetical reasonable director would have brought termination of material agreements to board's attention, if known - no such knowledge held by managing director - factual foundation of managing director receiving copy of termination agreement not made out - no breaches of duty of care and diligence established CORPORATIONS - misleading and deceptive conduct in relation to a financial product - s 180(1) and s 1041H of the Corporations Act - alleged failure by managing director to ensure company did not mislead market - announcement 'potentially' misled market as to ongoing supply to former customer - risk of exposure of company to breach of continuous disclosure obligations - hypothetical reasonable director would have prevented issue of misleading announcement - allegation that managing director knew of termination of ongoing supply agreement not made out - no breaches of duty of care and diligence established CORPORATIONS - alternative plea - s 180(1) of the Corporations Act - whether managing director should have enquired as to status of material agreements before approving market announcement - hypothetical reasonable director would not have made such enquiries EVIDENCE - standard of proof - where main witness called by each party unsatisfactory - use of objective factual surrounding material, inherent commercial probabilities and documentary evidence - drawing of inferences from available evidence EVIDENCE - expert evidence - objections to admissibility of expert report - whether witness has necessary specialised knowledge - whether opinion based on specialised knowledge - objections overruled
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate