Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Diawara v National Australia Bank Limited [2023] FCA 1048 File number(s): NSD 265 of 2022
Judgment of: ABRAHAM J
Date of judgment: 8 September 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – legal professional privilege – whether legal professional privilege attaches to a document – where solicitor commissioned third party to produce document on instruction from respondent – whether document was prepared for the dominant purpose of obtaining legal advice – whether privilege had been waived – whether conduct of respondent is consistent with maintenance of privilege HELD – claim of legal professional privilege upheld
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (No 2) [2020] FCA 1013 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Australian Lending Centre Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 1057; (2011) 283 ALR 299 AWB Limited v Cole [2006] FCA 571; (2006) 152 FCR 382 AWB Limited v Cole (No 5) [2006] FCA 1234; (2006) 155 FCR 30 Balabel v Air India [1988] Ch 317 Barnes v Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCAFC 88; (2007) 242 ALR 601 BWO19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 181; (2020) 283 FCR 299 Commissioner of Taxation v Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 6; (2003) 195 ALR 717 Commissioner of Taxation v Rio Tinto Limited [2006] FCAFC 86; (2006) 151 FCR 341 Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Archer [2008] NSWCA 164; (2008) 72 NSWLR 236 Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2002] HCA 49; (2002) 213 CLR 543 DBCT Management Pty Ltd v McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd and Geosea Australia Pty Ltd Joint Venture [2021] FCA 512 District Council of Mallala v Livestock Markets Ltd [2006] SASC 80; (2006) 94 SASR 258 DSE (Holdings) Pty Ltd v InterTAN Inc [2003] FCA 1191; (2003) 135 FCR 151 DSE (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Intertan Inc [2003] FCA 384; (2003) 127 FCR 499 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1999] HCA 67; (1999) 201 CLR 49 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Spotless Services Ltd [1996] HCA 34; (1996) 186 CLR 404 Grant v Downs [1976] HCA 63; (1976) 135 CLR 674 Hancock v Rinehart (Privilege) [2016] NSWSC 12 Hartogen Energy Limited (in liq) v The Australian Gas Light Company [1992] FCA 484; (1992) 36 FCR 557 Kennedy v Wallace [2004] FCAFC 337; (2004) 142 FCR 185 Mann v Carnell [1999] HCA 66; (1999) 201 CLR 1 Mitsubishi Electric Australia Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority [2002] VSCA 59; (2002) 4 VR 332 National Crime Authority v S [1991] FCA 234; (1991) 29 FCR 203 Osland v Secretary, Department of Justice [2008] HCA 37; (2008) 234 CLR 275 Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2004] FCAFC 122; (2004) 136 FCR 357 Re Southland Coal Pty Ltd (rec & mgrs apptd) (in liq) [2006] NSWSC 899; (2006) 203 FLR 1 Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 23) [2021] FCA 1460; (2021) 157 ACSR 438 Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 25) [2021] FCA 1558 TerraCom v ASIC [2022] FCA 208; (2022) 401 ALR 143 The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1247; (2005) 225 ALR 266 Three Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No 6) [2004] UKHL 48; [2005] 1 AC 610 Westminster Airways Ltd v Kuwait Oil Co Ltd [1951] 1 KB 134 Woollahra Municipal Council v Westpac Banking Corporation (1994) 33 NSWLR 529
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate