Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Buntin v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1055 File number(s): QUD 313 of 2022
Judgment of: MEAGHER J
Date of judgment: 7 September 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION LAW – Application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal ("Tribunal") – Where applicant failed the character test – Whether there is another reason why the visa cancellation should be revoked – Whether Tribunal failed to understand and evaluate representations regarding the applicant's physical and mental health – Whether Tribunal failed to evaluate representations regarding the applicant's ability to secure employment – Whether Tribunal denied procedural fairness in its determination that the best interests of minor children weighed heavily against revocation of the applicant's visa – Whether Tribunal denied procedural fairness in determining that lies told to the Tribunal constitute "other serious conduct" – Whether Tribunal misapplied or misinterpreted paragraph 8.1.1(1)(b)(ii) of Direction 90 – Whether Tribunal had regard to an irrelevant consideration – Application allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 499(1), 501(3A), 501(7)(c), 501CA(4)
Cases cited: AXT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 32 BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2019) 268 CLR 29; [2019] HCA 34 Chamoun v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2020) 276 FCR 75; [2020] FCAFC 66 Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576; [1994] FCA 1074 Degning v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 270 FCR 451; [2019] FCAFC 67 GXXS v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 468 Hernandez v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 415 Huang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 901 Khodr v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 198 Kymm v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1069 Mamatta v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 637 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24; [1986] HCA 40 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CPA16 (2019) 268 FCR 379; [2019] FCAFC 40 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2021) 273 CLR 506; [2021] HCA 17 Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs (2022) 403 ALR 398; [2022] HCA 26 Nguyen v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 127 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs (2022) 400 ALR 417; [2022] HCA 17 RZMW v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1761 Somaghi v Minister for Immigration Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1991) 31 FCR 100 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 228 CLR 152; [2006] HCA 63
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate