Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Sivwright v St Ives Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] FCA 1063 File number: WAD 244 of 2020
Judgment of: FEUTRILL JJ
Date of judgment: 8 September 2023
Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS - application for leave pursuant to s 46PO of the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) alleging unlawful discrimination - where complaint of discrimination to the Australian Human Rights Commission was terminated under s 46PH(1)(b) of the Act due to delay - whether the applicant's claims of sex and disability discrimination, harassment and victimisation reasonably arguable – whether delay explained – whether prejudice caused by delay – consideration of principles applicable to leave – jurisdictional objection – whether respondents to the terminated complaint
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) ss 3, 3(1), 11(1)(aa), 13, 14(1), 19(1), 46(1)(b)(ii), 46(1B)(a), 46P, 46P(1), 46P(1A), 46P(1B), 46P(4), 46PD, 46PD(1), 46PD(3), 46PD(3A), 46PH, 46PH(1), 46PH(1)(b), 46PH(1)(b)(ii), 46PH(1B), 46PH(1C), 46PO, 46PO(1), 46PO(3A); Ptt II, IIB, Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) ss 4, 5, 6, 15, 15(2), 35(1), 42(1), 43; Pt 2 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 44, 59, 87 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AF, 37M, 37N, 37P Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) ss 5, 14, 14(2), 15, 28A, 28A(1A), 28B, 28B(1)(a), 28B(2), 28B(6), 28D, 94, 105, 106; Ptt II, IV Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 2.32(1)(b), 2.32(3)(a), 26.01
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate