Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
BIQ18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1084 Appeal from: BIQ18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] FedCFamC2G 607
File number: VID 477 of 2022
Judgment of: RARES J
Date of judgment: 21 August 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – claim for protection visa under s 36(2)(a) or (aa) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where visa application required to provide written one-sentence response to written question in biodata interview asking reason for seeking protection – where Tribunal raised concerns with visa applicant about one-sentence response – where Tribunal characterised translation of response to written question as "glib" – whether Tribunal failed to consider important evidence regarding biodata interview – Held: appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36(2)(a), (aa)
Cases cited: Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 236 FCR 593 AVQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 266 FCR 83 Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission (2000) 199 CLR 135 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT (2013) 212 FCR 99 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Plaintiff M64/2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 258 CLR 173
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate