Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Alexander Abramov v Minister for Foreign Affairs (No 2) [2023] FCA 1099 File number(s): VID 335 of 2022
Judgment of: KENNY J
Date of judgment: 15 September 2023
Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW – judicial review of Instruments made by the Minister designating and declaring the applicant pursuant to item 6A(a) of reg 6 of the Autonomous Sanctions Regulations 2011 (Cth) (Regulations) – where item 6A(a) of the Regulations required the Minister to be satisfied that the applicant "is, or has been, engaging in an activity or performing a function that is of economic or strategic significance to Russia" – proper construction of the Regulations – whether item 6A(a) of reg 6 requires a "clear and substantial nexus" – whether Instruments challenged are legislative or administrative in character – whether Minister's public statements constituted her reasons or findings – whether the Minister constructively failed to exercise jurisdiction in failing to understand the discretionary nature of the power – whether the Minister's state of satisfaction was reasonably formed on the material before her – whether the Minister acted on an error of fact resulting in the failure to perform the task required under item 6A(a) of reg 6 – whether the Minister denied the applicant procedural fairness in designating and declaring him without notice – whether the Autonomous Sanctions Act 2010 (Cth) and the Regulations exclude procedural fairness JUDICIAL REVIEW – where the applicant made an application for revocation under reg 10 of the Regulations – where the Minister revoked the first Instrument of designation and declaration and immediately made a further Instrument re-designating and re-declaring the applicant – whether the Regulations permitted the Minister to re-designate and re-declare the applicant – whether the Minister departed from procedural representation to provide the applicant with an opportunity to comment on material by not disclosing a Departmental submission – whether Minister erred in not having applicant's statutory declaration physically before her
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate