Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
CFU17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1107 Appeal from: CFU17 v Minister for Immigration [2020] FCCA 3364
File number(s): NSD 17 of 2021
Judgment of: MORTIMER CJ
Date of judgment: 15 September 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from decision of Federal Circuit Court of Australia (FCC) – where FCC dismissed application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) – where Tribunal affirmed decision to refuse to grant a protection visa – where Tribunal not satisfied that appellant faced serious or significant harm on the basis of being HIV positive – whether Tribunal decision was affected by jurisdictional error for failure to perform its statutory task by considering country information – whether Tribunal decision was affected by jurisdictional error for failure to consider an integer of the appellant's claims – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 36
Cases cited: ADU18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 366 ARK16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 825 BKQ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 40; 163 ALD 127 CAL15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1344 CCU21 v Minister for Home Affairs [2023] FCAFC 87 CPE15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 591 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; 264 CLR 123 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v MZYTS [2013] FCAFC 114; 230 FCR 431 Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 26; 403 ALR 398
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate