Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Raffin v Modern Assets Australia Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 1130 File number(s): VID 110 of 2021
Judgment of: MCEVOY J
Date of judgment: 21 September 2023
Catchwords: COSTS – review of Registrar's orders that costs of interlocutory application be paid forthwith – whether costs should be paid forthwith – whether to award indemnity costs – order that costs be paid forthwith on a party and party basis
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 35A(5), 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 16.21(1)(c), 40.13
Cases cited: Axent Holdings Pty Ltd v Compusign Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2018] FCA 6 Chancliff Holdings Pty Ltd v Bell [1999] FCA 1783 Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 Harris v Cigna Insurance Australia Ltd & Dickie (1995) ATPR 41-445 Martin & Anor v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (2001) 217 ALR 63; [2001] FCA 87 Orrcon Operations Pty Ltd v Capital Steel & Pipe Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCA 24 Rafferty v Time 2000 West Pty Ltd (No 3) (2009) 257 ALR 503; [2009] FCA 727 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229; [2001] FCA 1865 Smolle v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (No 2) [2007] FCA 1967 Walker v State of Victoria (No 2) [2011] FCA 417
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate