Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Storry v Parkyn [2023] FCA 1141 Review of: Registrar's decision of Federal Court of Australia
File number: QUD 364 of 2023
Judgment of: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 21 September 2023
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for judicial review of a Registrar's decision to refuse to accept documents for filing – application dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 5 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 35A(5) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 2.26 and 39.05
Cases cited: Clone Pty Ltd v Players Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2018] HCA 12; (2018) 264 CLR 165 Nyoni v Murphy [2018] FCAFC 75 Spalla v St George Motor Finance Ltd (No 5) [2004] FCA 1262 Storry v Business Licensing Authority [2023] FCA 964 Storry v Business Licensing Authority (No 2) [2023] FCA 102 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378; [1993] HCA 77
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 16
Date of hearing: 21 September 2023
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant was self-represented
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent filed a submitting notice
ORDERS QUD 364 of 2023
BETWEEN: VENETIA LOUISE STORRY Applicant
AND: NIC PARKYN Respondent
order made by: RANGIAH J DATE OF ORDER: 21 SEPTEMBER 2023
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The originating application be dismissed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate