Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Coal Mining Industry (Long Service Leave Funding) Corporation v Hitachi Construction Machinery (Australia) Pty Ltd (Penalty) [2023] FCA 1187 File number: NSD 843 of 2021
Judgment of: RAPER J
Date of judgment: 6 October 2023
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – pecuniary penalties – determination of appropriate penalty – where respondent contravened ss 5(1) and 10(1) of Coal Mining Industry (Long Service Leave) Payroll Levy Collection Act 1992 (Cth) – where mistake of fact defence under s 95 of Regulatory Powers (Standard Provisions) Act 2014 (Cth) relied upon by the respondent without being pleaded – whether a single penalty ought be applied by operation of the statutory double jeopardy provision under s 84(2) of the Act – application of the appropriate penalty COSTS – where respondent seeks apportionment of costs on issue-by-issue basis – whether costs to be awarded to the applicant should be discounted
Legislation: Coal Mining Industry (Long Service Leave) Administration Act 1992 (Cth) ss 4, 4(b), 49A Coal Mining Industry (Long Service Leave) Payroll Levy Act 1992 (Cth) s 6 Coal Mining Industry (Long Service Leave) Payroll Levy Collection Act 1992 (Cth) ss 4, 5(1), 6, 10(1), 13A(5), 13A(5)(a), 13A(5)(b), 13A(5)(c) Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 417, 421, 546(1) Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Regulatory Powers (Standard Provisions) Act 2014 (Cth) Pt 4, ss 82(2), 82(3), 82(5)(a), 82(6), 82(6)(a), 82(6)(b), 82(6)(c), 82(6)(d), 83(1), 84(2), 85, 95, 95(1)(a)(ii)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate