Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
BIJ18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1220 Appeal from: BIJ18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FedCFamC2G 443
File number: VID 344 of 2022
Judgment of: SNADEN J
Date of judgment: 16 October 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) – where primary judge dismissed application for judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority (the "IAA") – where IAA rejected application for protection visa – where relocation was considered reasonable – whether IAA failed properly to consider objection to relocation based on asserted need for immediate employment – no jurisdictional error – no error on part of primary judge – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5, 5AA, 5H, 35A, 36, 473BB, 473CA, 473DB, 476)
Cases cited: AHK16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 161 ALD 457 BIJ18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FedCFamC2G 443 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZGUR (2011) 241 CLR 594 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v Viane (2021) 274 CLR 398 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs (2022) 96 ALJR 497 SZATV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 233 CLR 18 WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 236 FCR 593
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate