Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
McPartland v Commissioner of Taxation [2023] FCA 1260 Appeal from: McPartland v Commissioner of Taxation [2022] AATA 686
File number: SAD 70 of 2022
Judgment of: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 20 October 2023
Catchwords: TAXATION – appeal from decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal on a question of law – Tribunal upholding an Objection Decision in relation to default assessments made under s 167 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – Tribunal misunderstanding and failing to resolve two issues raised by the taxpayers – failures amounting to errors of law – taxpayers having onus to show that the assessments were excessive and what the assessed amounts ought to have been – material before the Tribunal material incapable of discharging the taxpayers' onus – no utility in remittal to the Tribunal – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 166, 167, 190 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) ss 14AAK, 14ZZ, 14ZZK
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Bosanac v Commissioner of Taxation [2019] HCA 41; 374 ALR 425 Commissioner of Taxation v Ross (2021) 174 ALD 77 Dennis Willcox Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1988) 79 ALR 267 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Dalco (1990) 168 CLR 614 Gashi v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2013) 209 FCR 301 Ma v Commissioner of Taxation (1992) 37 FCR 225 McPartland v Commissioner of Taxation [2022] AATA 686 Rigoli v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2014) 141 ALD 529 Waraich v Minister for Home Affairs (2021) 286 FCR 45 Waterford v Commonwealth (1987) 163 CLR 54
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate