Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
CXF17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1278 Appeal from: CXF17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCCA 1666
File number: WAD 169 of 2020
Judgment of: BANKS-SMITH J
Date of judgment: 24 October 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION - appeal from decision of Federal Circuit Court of Australia dismissing review of fast track reviewable decision of Immigration Assessment Authority - where Authority affirmed decision of the delegate of the Minister to refuse grant of a protection visa - whether Authority acted unreasonably in failing to obtain new country information - whether Authority failed to take into account matters relevant to alleged links to the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Ealam in assessing risk of harm - whether Authority failed to take into account effect of Prevention of Terrorism Act 1979 - whether the Authority obliged to put inconsistencies to the appellant or undertake due diligence about claims - whether primary judge erred in consideration of claims made before the Authority - appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5H, 36, 473CA, 473CB, 473DC, 473DD, 473DF, Part 7AA
Cases cited: ABT17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] HCA 34; (2020) 269 CLR 439 DIJ16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1038 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Tesic [2017] FCAFC 93; (2017) 251 FCR 23 Ozberk v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 79 FCR 249 SZJMG v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1145 SZNOE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 96
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate