Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Sherrin Rentals Pty Ltd, in the matter of Herbert v Herbert [2023] FCA 1323 File number: QUD 90 of 2023
Judgment of: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 25 July 2023
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – where a judgment debtor seeks review of a sequestration order of a registrar of the Federal Court of Australia – where the review is de novo on evidence and law – where it is for the petitioning creditor to discharge the onus of proof in respect of matters stated in the petition Bechara v Bates (2021) 286 FCR 166 and Totev v Sfar (2008) 167 FCR 193 applied – where credit petitioner must prove service of petition and debt owing – where court retains discretion whether to make sequestration order – where the court is satisfied the debt is owing and the bankruptcy notice was served on debtor – where the court is satisfied the debtor failed to comply with bankruptcy notice and the petition was served as required – whether debtor can prove solvency for the court to exercise discretion to dismiss petition or alternatively to stay operation of sequestration order under s 52(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) (Bankruptcy Act) – where the test of solvency is found in s 5(2) and s 5(3) of the Bankruptcy Act – cash flow rather than balance sheet test – where the focus is on liquidity Tarwala v Amirbeaggi as trustee for bankruptcy [2022] FCA 1593 cited – where the proof of solvency need only occur on the balance of probabilities under s 140(1) of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – where court is not satisfied that debtor is solvent based on lack of evidence – where a loan facility from an associated entity is insufficient to meet total debt – where debtor not likely to meet loan repayments if facility drawn down in full – where source of funds which form basis of the loan facility not in evidence – where there is no supporting documentation of the financial position of the associated entity in evidence – where the debtor has not lodged tax returns since 2019 – where the court finds the debtor is hopelessly insolvent – application for review of sequestration order dismissed – sequestration order affirmed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate