Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Sage v AYI23 [2023] FCA 1336 File number(s): NSD 322 of 2023
Judgment of: ABRAHAM J
Date of judgment: 2 November 2023
Catchwords: CONTEMPT OF COURT – sentencing – contempt of the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission – contempt punishable as contempt of Federal Court – Respondent in contempt by refusing to answer questions in examination – where respondent pleaded guilty – where contempt not subsequently purged – where summons no longer extant – fixed term of imprisonment imposed.
Legislation: Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) ss 7, 7C, 19A, 21A, 20-22, 34A(a)(ii), 34B, 46B Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Pt 42
Cases cited: Allbeury v Corruption and Crime Commission [2012] WASCA 84; (2012) 42 WAR 425 Anderson v BYF19 [2019] FCA 1959 Anderson v DKH18 [2018] FCA 1571 Anderson v GPY18 [2019] FCA 954 Anderson v XLVII [2015] FCA 19 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v INFO4PC.com Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 949; (2002) 121 FCR 24 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jutsen (No 6) [2012] FCA 809 Australian Crime Commission v DTO21 [2022] FCA 288 Hannaford (an examiner under the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002) v HH [2010] FCA 1214; (2010) 205 A Crim R 366 Hannaford v HH (No 2) [2012] FCA 560; (2012) 203 FCR 501 Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 Hughes v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2004] FCAFC 319; (2004) 247 FCR 277 Kazal v Thunder Studios Inc (California) [2017] FCAFC 111; (2017) 256 FCR 90 Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Design Elegance Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 83; (2006) 149 FCR 494 Lusty v CRA20 [2020] FCA 1737 Lusty v CVA22 [2023] FCA 130 Lusty (Examiner) v DEZ22 (No 2) [2023] FCA 858 The Queen v Pham [2015] HCA 39; (2015) 256 CLR 550 Vaysman v Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc [2011] FCAFC 17; (2011) 276 ALR 596 Von Doussa v Owens (No 3) [1982] SASC 6369; (1982) 31 SASR 116 Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584 Wood, Honourable Justice v Galea [1995] NSWSC 100; (1995) 79 A Crim R 567 Wood v Staunton (No 5) (1996) 86 A Crim R 183
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate