Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v OZI4X4 Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 1361 File number(s): VID 136 of 2021
Judgment of: KENNY J
Date of judgment: 8 November 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where orders in the nature of an injunction sought by consent – where there is no evidence or statement of agreed facts before the Court – orders made COSTS – application for indemnity costs – some delay in providing consent orders to the Court – application refused
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2, Australian Consumer Law Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Virgin Mobile Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2002] FCA 1548 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Francis [2004] FCA 487; 142 FCR 1 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australia Inc [1999] FCA 18; 161 ALR 79 Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Limited (1993) 46 FCR 225 Hamod v State of New South Wales [2002] FCAFC 97; 188 ALR 659 Martens v Stokes [2016] FCA 1010 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) [2001] FCA 1865; 115 FCR 229 Tetijo Holdings Pty Ltd v Keeprite Australia Pty Ltd [1991] FCA 225 Thomson Australian Holdings Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1981) 148 CLR 150
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate