Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
DKT20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1372 Appeal from: DKT20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCCA 839
File number: QUD 164 of 2021
Judgment of: THOMAS J
Date of judgment: 9 November 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from judgment of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia (FCCA) – where FCCA dismissed an application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) – where Tribunal affirmed decision of delegate of Minister to refuse to grant the appellants protection visas – where first appellant had engaged in anti-corruption activity in past – where Tribunal found the appellants' fears of persecution were not well-founded and appellants did not face a real risk of significant harm – whether FCCA erred in failing to find that the Tribunal failed to consider the risk to the appellants of the first appellant engaging in future anti-corruption conduct – whether FCCA erred in failing to find that the Tribunal's decision was illogical, irrational or legally unreasonable – no errors made out – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Cases cited: Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 236 FCR 593; [2003] FCAFC 184 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 AYY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 261 FCR 503; [2018] FCAFC 89 BKW17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs (2023) 296 FCR 115; [2023] FCAFC 1 DJL19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 451 Djokovic v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2022) 289 FCR 21; [2022] FCAFC 3 DKT20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCCA 839 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2003) 197 ALR 389; [2003] HCA 26 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Eden (2016) 240 FCR 158; [2016] FCAFC 28 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Haq (2019) 267 FCR 513; [2019] FCAFC 7 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI (2009) 259 ALR 429; [2009] HCA 39 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611; [2010] HCA 16 Onyebuchi v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1183 VUAX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 238 FCR 588; [2004] FCAFC 158
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate