Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Conradsen v Carpentaria Land Council Aboriginal Corporation [2023] FCA 1373 File number: QUD 337 of 2022
Judgment of: THOMAS J
Date of judgment: 9 November 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application for stay of hearing and determination of costs issue in proceedings in Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) – whether discretion should be exercised to grant stay – where respondent provided undertaking to consent to a stay of a costs order until determination of appeal in the event that such an order is made – application dismissed
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Citrus Queensland Pty Ltd v Sunstate Orchards Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1867 Commissioner of Taxation v Rowntree (No 2) [2021] FCA 268 Conradsen v Carpentaria Land Council Aboriginal Corporation [2022] FedCFamC2G 679 Energy Beverages LLC v Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCA 394 Finch & Finch (No.3) [2020] FCCA 72 Stefanovski v Digital Central Australia (Assets) Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1121
Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 37
Date of hearing: 6 April 2023
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant was self-represented
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms S Moody
Solicitor for the Respondent: Thynne & Macartney
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate