Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Jarvis-Lavery v Commissioner of Taxation [2023] FCA 1382 Appeal from: Application for extension of time to appeal from: Jarvis-Lavery and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation) [2019] AATA 5409 (13 December 2019)
File number(s): VID 142 of 2022
Judgment of: HESPE J
Date of judgment: 10 November 2023
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for extension of time to appeal decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether adequate explanation for delay of two years – where Tribunal member retired before decision could be made – whether there was a denial of procedural fairness by reason of a reconstituted Tribunal not providing the Applicant with a further oral hearing
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 19D, 44 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) s 14ZZ
Cases cited: Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor [1996] HCA 25; (1996) 186 CLR 541 Brown v Commissioner of Taxation [1999] FCA 563 Comcare v A'Hearn (1993) 45 FCR 441 Frugtniet v Tax Practitioners Board [2018] FCA 387 Frugtniet v Tax Practitioners Board [2019] FCAFC 193 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen [1984] FCA 186; (1984) 3 FCR 344 Logounov v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2000] FCA 1745; (2000) 46 ATR 158 Mount Lawley Pty Ltd v Western Australian Planning Commission [2004] WASCA 149; (2004) 29 WAR 273 Nais v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCA 77; (2005) 228 CLR 470 Peczalski v Comcare [1999] FCA 366 Tu'uta Katoa v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] HCA 28; (2022) 403 ALR 604
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate