Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ogawa v Stewart (No 3) [2023] FCA 1386 File number: QUD 325 of 2022
Judgment of: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 13 November 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Federal Court of Australia Rules 2011 – application under r 39.05(a) to set aside judgment – where applicant did not appear at hearing – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 2.26, 30.22 and 39.05
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v ActiveSuper Pty Ltd (No 4) [2013] FCA 318 Lal v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2014] FCA 892 Ogawa v Buckingham (No 2) [2023] FCA 1387 Ogawa v Finance Minister [2020] FCA 829 Ogawa v Finance Minister [2021] FCAFC 17 Ogawa v Stewart (No 2) [2023] FCA 661 Ogawa v Stewart [2023] FCA 286 Polis v Zombor (No 5) [2022] FCA 122
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 17
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant was self-represented
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent filed a submitting notice
ORDERS QUD 325 of 2022
BETWEEN: MEGUMI OGAWA Applicant
AND: THOMAS STEWART Respondent
order made by: RANGIAH J DATE OF ORDER: 13 NOVEMBER 2023
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant's interlocutory application filed on 18 April 2023 be dismissed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate