Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Mudiy v Minister for Home Affairs [2023] FCA 1402 Appeal from: Mudiy v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] FedCFamC2G 346
File number(s): VID 331 of 2022
Judgment of: O'BRYAN J
Date of judgment: 16 November 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Div 2) – where Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) dismissed application for review of decision refusing to grant appellant's partner visa application – appellant's marriage had ceased and sponsorship was withdrawn – appellant made a non-judicially determined claim of family violence – appellant failed to provide evidence in support of claim as required under reg 1.24(b) of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) and legislative instrument IMMI 12/116 – at hearing before the Tribunal, appellant requested adjournment to enable him to remedy deficiencies in his application – Tribunal refused to grant an adjournment – decision not legally unreasonable in the circumstances – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), Pt 5, Div 5, ss 360, 363 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Div 1.5, regs 1.21, 1.22, 1.23, 1.24, Sch 2, cl 801.221
Cases cited: Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh (2014) 139 ALD 50 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 264 CLR 541 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs v Lieu, by her Litigation Representative Nguyen (2023) 297 FCR 162 Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs (2022) 278 ALD 536
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate