Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
The Epoch Holding Group Pty Ltd v Katz [2023] FCA 1468 File number(s): NSD 527 of 2022
Judgment of: CHEESEMAN J
Date of judgment: 24 November 2023
Catchwords: COSTS – whether costs order should be made – where, if costs order made, whether costs should be payable forthwith following the dismissal of an interlocutory application – where the application concerns access to documents – where the application has been rendered otiose by reason of access to documents being provided without final determination of the merits of application – Held: Cost orders made on usual terms. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where parties seek confidentiality orders – where agreement in principle as to necessity to protect confidential information – Held: application successful
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.13
Cases cited: Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Costs Forthwith) [2019] FCA 1065 ONE.TEL Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2000] FCA 270; 101 FCR 548 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin [1997] HCA 6; 186 CLR 622 Tour Squad Pty Ltd v Fifth Amendment Entertainment Inc [2020] FCA 1649
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs
Number of paragraphs: 10
Date of last submissions: 17 November 2023
Date of hearing: 15 June 2023, determined by consent on the papers.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate