Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Corbisieri v NM Superannuation Proprietary Limited (No 2) [2023] FCA 1531 File number(s): VID 442 of 2023
Judgment of: O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 5 December 2023
Catchwords: COSTS – whether indemnity costs should be ordered following rejection of Calderbank offer – whether Australian Financial Complaints Authority's erroneous decision should result in an adverse costs order – circumstances do not warrant departure from ordinary position
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1057 Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth) Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic)
Cases cited: Anchorage Capital Partners Pty Ltd v Acpa Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 112 Clifton v Kerry J Investment Pty Ltd (No 2) (2020) 277 FCR 382 Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 Corbisieri v NM Superannuation Proprietary Limited [2023] FCA 1319 Hazeldene's Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian Workcover Authority (No 2) (2005) 13 VR 435 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 MS PD v Registrar of the Federal Court of Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 1665 Northern Territory v Sangare (2019) 265 CLR 164 Our Town FM Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (No 3) [1987] FCA 675; (1987) 77 ALR 609 R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex parte Hardiman (1980) 144 CLR 13
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate