Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
FJA18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1539 Appeal from: FJA18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCCA 1922
File number: WAD 194 of 2020
Judgment of: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 8 December 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION - appeal from decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia - where application for safe haven enterprise visa refused and application for review of decision to the Immigration Assessment Authority was unsuccessful - where applicant sought judicial review of Authority's decision - where Circuit Court refused application for review - where decision of the High Court in AUS17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] HCA 37; (2020) 269 CLR 494 published following Circuit Court's decision - where first respondent accepts that AUS17 means there was legal error in Circuit Court decision - where first respondent seeks leave to rely on notice of contention - where determined that Authority did not fail in substance to assess satisfaction of the criteria in s 473DD(b)(i) and (ii) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - leave to rely upon notice of contention granted - contention ground upheld - appeal dismissed with costs
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 473DD Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.39, 36.24
Cases cited: AQU17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 111 AUS17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] HCA 37; (2020) 269 CLR 494 Craig v State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 DQI17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 106 Kirk v Industrial Court (NSW) [2010] HCA 1; (2010) 239 CLR 531
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate