Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Tang v Yu (application to vacate) [2023] FCA 1540 File number: NSD 488 of 2020
Judgment of: STEWART J
Date of judgment: 4 December 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application to vacate trial dates – interlocutory application dismissed
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 169 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 20.14(1), 20.14(2)
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 17
Date of hearing: 4 December 2023
Counsel for the Applicant: D Meyerowitz-Katz
Solicitor for the Applicant: Domantay Legal Pty Ltd
Counsel for the First Respondent: Y Chen
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ausjuris Legal Pty Ltd
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent did not appear.
ORDERS NSD 488 of 2020
BETWEEN: GUOHUA TANG Applicant
AND: JINYANG YU First Respondent
OLIVER ROTHS Second Respondent
order made by: STEWART J DATE OF ORDER: 4 DECEMBER 2023
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The interlocutory application filed by the first respondent on 30 November 2023 be dismissed. 2. The applicant produce to the first respondent as soon as possible the original electronic form in which the applicant has the documents that are reproduced at pages 6, 7, and 8 of the affidavit of Jie Shi Lee dated 30 November 2023. 3. The costs of the interlocutory application filed by the first respondent on 30 November 2023 be reserved, save that if no further order is made in relation to them they become costs in the cause. 4. The first respondent be granted leave to discontinue the interlocutory application filed on 24 November 2023. 5. Costs of the first respondent's interlocutory application filed on 24 November 2023 be reserved. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate