Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
GKYW v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1543 Review of: Application for judicial review of GKYW and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (Migration) [2022] AATA 4119
File number: VID 785 of 2022
Judgment of: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 7 December 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – character case – where applicant's visa was subject to mandatory cancellation – where a delegate decided not to revoke the cancellation decision – where the Tribunal affirmed the decision of the delegate – where the applicant contended that the Tribunal fell into jurisdictional error by taking into account findings of guilt in relation to juvenile charges in respect of which no conviction was recorded – where the Minister conceded that the Tribunal had erred – whether the Tribunal's error was material – held: application allowed
Legislation: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), ss 85ZM, 85ZR, 85ZS Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 501, 501CA Youth Justice Act 1992 (Qld), s 184
Cases cited: Au v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 125; 295 FCR 315 Hartwig v Hack [2007] FCA 1039 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] HCA 17; 273 CLR 506 Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 26; 403 ALR 398 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17; 400 ALR 417 Thornton v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 23; 288 FCR 10 Thornton v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] HCA 17; 409 ALR 234
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate