Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Sayed v National Disability Insurance Agency [2023] FCA 1550 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Sayed v National Disability Insurance Agency and Anor [2022] FCA 1494
File number(s): VID 761 of 2022
Judgment of: ANDERSON J
Date of judgment: 7 December 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal from primary judge decision refusing access to audio recording of a case management hearing – where application made in connection with application for primary judge to recuse on the grounds of actual bias and apprehended bias – where recusal application dismissed and leave to appeal that decision dismissed – where all appellate challenges to recusal decision exhausted – where application for leave to appeal decision concerning access to audio recording is inutile – application dismissed.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1974 (Cth) s 25(2)(a) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 2.32
Cases cited: Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Duncan v Secretary, Dept of Family and Community Services [2007] FCA 507 Edwards v Santos [2010] FCA 34 Paschke v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2023] FCAFC 143 Sayed v Justice Michael Hugh O'Bryan & Ors [2023] HCASL 170 Sayed v National Disability Insurance Agency [2023] HCASL 41 Sayed v National Disability Insurance Agency (No 2) [2022] FCA 1591 Sayed v National Disability Insurance Agency (No 3) [2022] FCA 1600
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate