Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Chiodo Corporation Pty Ltd v Coolangatta & Tweed Heads Golf Club Ltd [2023] FCA 1566 File number: VID 998 of 2023
Judgment of: SNADEN J
Date of judgment: 30 November 2023
Date of publication of reasons: 12 December 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application for urgent injunctive relief – where urgent injunctive relief sought to restrain respondent from entertaining consideration of special resolution at a meeting of members – whether there is a prima facie case that favours injunctive relief – alleged misleading and deceptive conduct – whether balance of convenience favours injunctive relief – application for interlocutory relief granted
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), sch 2 s 18
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR AWU v Dee Vee [2012] FCA 988 Bullock v FFTSA (1985) 5 FCR 464 Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia (1986) 161 CLR 148 CEPU v Blue Star Pacific (2009) 184 IR 333 Liberty Financial Pty Ltd v Jugovic [2021] FCA 607 Quinn v Overland (2010) 199 IR 40 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd v Apple Inc. (2011) 217 FCR 238 Sigma Pharmaceuticals (Australia) Pty Ltd v Wyeth (2009) 81 IPR 339
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate