Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
CZQL v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1610 Appeal from: Application for Extension of Time: CZQL and Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] AATA 2715
File number: NSD 724 of 2021
Judgment of: THOMAS J
Date of judgment: 15 December 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – application for extension of time to apply for review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) not to revoke cancellation of applicant's visa – where Minister's delegate cancelled applicant's spouse visa under s 501(3A) – where different delegate decided not to revoke cancellation decision – where applicant in prison when notified of delegate's non-revocation decision – where Tribunal affirmed delegate's non-revocation decision – delay of three and a half years in lodging application for extension of time – whether necessary in the interests of the administration of justice to grant extension – whether reasonable explanation for delay – assessment of prospects of success of proposed application for review at a "reasonably impressionistic" level – extension of time refused
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Ministerial Direction 65
Cases cited: Beni v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 267 FCR 15; [2018] FCAFC 228 Bettencourt v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2021) 287 FCR 294; [2021] FCAFC 172 BLS16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 192 BNV15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1048 BQQ15 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 218 BTI15 v Minister for Immigration [2016] FCCA 2326 BTI15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2021] FCA 355 BTI15 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 49 BTU17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 538 CBM19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 551 CNC15 v Federal Circuit Court of Australia [2018] FCAFC 204 CQW17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 1436 DHX17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2020) 278 FCR 475; [2020] FCAFC 127 DKX17 v Federal Circuit Court of Australia (2019) 268 FCR 64; [2019] FCAFC 10 DLE16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 136 EBT16 v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 374 ALR 443; [2019] HCA 44 EPL20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2021) 288 FCR 158; [2021] FCAFC 173 EXU17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 267 FCR 305; [2018] FCA 1675 FKV17 v Minister for Home Affairs (2022) 292 FCR 201; [2022] FCAFC 93 FPK18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 723 Guo v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 34 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 Jess v Scott (1986) 12 FCR 187 Katoa v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2022) 403 ALR 604; [2022] HCA 28 Khalil v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 271 FCR 326; [2019] FCAFC 151 Lee v Fair Work Commission [2020] FCA 1204 Mentink v Minister for Home Affairs [2013] FCAFC 113 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v EFX17 (2021) 271 CLR 112; [2021] HCA 9 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton (2016) 237 FCR 1; [2016] FCAFC 11 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Tesic (2017) 251 FCR 23; [2017] FCAFC 93 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh (2000) 98 FCR 77; [2000] FCA 377 MZABP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 242 FCR 585; [2015] FCA 1391 MZABP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 152 ALD 478; [2016] FCAFC 110 MZZIV v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCA 1203 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs (2022) 400 ALR 417; [2022] HCA 17 Re Commonwealth of Australia; Ex parte Marks (2000) 177 ALR 491; [2000] HCA 67 Sainju v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2010) 185 FCR 86; [2010] FCA 461 Seiler v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 48 FCR 83 Sillars v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2021) 288 FCR 180; [2021] FCAFC 174 Singh v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 724 Singh v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 57 Stewart v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2020) 281 FCR 578; [2020] FCAFC 196 SZNYE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 500 SZOBI v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) (2010) 119 ALD 233; [2010] FCAFC 151 SZQBI v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 1388 SZSDA v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 1319 SZTRY v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 86 Tay v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2010) 183 FCR 163; [2010] FCAFC 23 Tran v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 533 Vella v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 326 ALR 391; [2015] HCA 42
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate